BFI type question:
How do two authors on your syllabus use narration to highlight questions of morality?
(Compare the use of narrative voice in Disgrace and The Scarlet Letter)
In The Scarlet Letter Hawthorne addresses the question of morality by employing third person narration, which contrasts perspectives between characters. On the other hand, Coetzee in Disgrace uses a much more limited and focused third person narration and detached tone to criticize and highlight the morality of his protagonist.
In both TSL by Hawthorne and Disgrace by Coetzee, third person narration crticitzes the dominant form of society’s imposed morality. On the one hand, Coetzee shocks the reader with a patriarchal voice, and on the other hand Hawthorne provides a compassionate voice that questions Puritan rigidity.
The SL by Hawthorne is a novel riddled with extensive and elaborate descriptions, bringing the Puritan world forth with striking imagery. This vibrant method of narration clashes with the Puritan society it establishes, invoking the notion of rigid morality as a result. In contrast, in JM Coetzee’s Disgrace, the limited omniscient narrator uses a completely opposing numb, detached tone to make the reader uncomfortable and highlight questions the lacking morality.



